Change and Continuity : Republican Thought Since 1922
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
American Policy in Persian Gulf Region: Continuity or Change at the Trump Era
United States power in Persian Gulf has risen since the end of Second World War. Dividing U.S. presence in the Region into the Cold war and post-Cold war era, the principle policy in first period was narrowing the impact of Soviet Union in the Region and in latter, Access to Persian Gulf region’s oil and controlling the major threats which can disrupt the flow of oil to global energy market. Fo...
متن کامل1 A Problem Posed in Tampa
At the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, in an interview with NPR’s Robert Siegel, former Congressman Thomas Davis (R-Va) talked about the future of American politics. “What you’re finding is that both parties are just moving right and left,” he said. Siegel then asked if Davis thought this would change. CongressmanDavis replied that he thought it would get worse. “And I’ll explain ...
متن کاملReading and Understanding Continuity and Change in Spatial Organization of Local Houses (Case study: sabzevar city)
Today, there are a few dozens of historical index houses in the city Sabzevar. Reviews show that up until now, despite the presence of their special characteristics, variety and role, there have not been comprehensive studies about them but through the presence of valuable samples from various historical periods (Teymouri, Safavid, Qajar, Pahlavi), their exposure to destruction through changing...
متن کاملPolls and ElectionsReversal of Fortune: The Political Behavior of White Migrants to the South
What are the political implications of domestic migration to the American South? Using the American National Election Studies, we track the changing dynamic of party identification and presidential voting among white southern in-migrants and natives. Although it was once thought southern in-migration from the rest of the country contributed to Republican ascendancy in the region, we find that i...
متن کاملRepublican Freedom and the Rule of Law
At the core of republican thought, on Philip Pettit’s account, lies the conception of freedom as non-domination as opposed to freedom as non-interference in the liberal sense. I revisit the distinction between liberal and republican freedom and argue that republican freedom incorporates a particular rule-oflaw requirement, whereas liberal freedom does not. Liberals may also endorse such a requi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004